I’m a little stuck on a question from one of the exams regarding Cumulative and Statutory voting.
“Your customer owns 200 shares of Emery Co. Stock which is under statutory voting systems. With 7 open board seats, what is the maximum number of votes your customer may apply towards one board seat?”
Answer: 200
Optional Answer: 29 (200/7)
Then I looked at the differences between Cumulative and Statutory.
“ • Statutory: Allows the stockholder to apply only the amount of votes they have to each BOD position being voted on. Statutory voting structures are more beneficial for larger stockholders.
- Cumulative: Allows the stockholder to apply the total amount of votes they have to any BOD position being voted on. Cumulative voting structures are more beneficial for small stockholders.
Let’s take a look at a few examples to understand how this concept applies:
An investor owns 100 shares of stock with a statutory voting structure. There are 3 open board positions.
- The investor has 300 votes
- 100 shares x 3 open positions
- The investor can only apply up to 100 votes per position
An investor owns 100 shares of stock with a cumulative voting structure. There are 3 open board positions.
- The investor has 300 votes
- 100 shares x 3 open positions
- The investor can apply up to 300 votes in any manner
As you can see, a cumulative voting structure allows the investor to apply all of their votes towards one single board position. Assume a stockholder really liked John for a BOD position. They could only apply 100 votes to John with a statutory voting structure, while they could apply 300 votes with a cumulative voting structure.”
It seems like the answer reflects a Cumulative voting system. If it was Statutory, wouldn’t the answer be 29?
Thank you!